CCNA Routing Protocol Comparison Chart Revised
Routing Protocols Comparison for CCNA
I have always said I was going to make this chart since I draw it on the board for nearly every CCNA class I teach. Well, here it is. I may add to it later.
|
Name |
Class |
Type |
Administrative Distance |
Metric |
Classful/less |
Algorithm |
Transport Type |
| RIP v1 |
Distance Vector |
IGP |
120 |
Hop Count |
Classful |
Bellman-Ford |
UDP/520 |
| RIP v2 |
Distance Vector |
IGP |
120 |
Hop Count |
Classless |
Bellman-Ford | UDP/520 |
| OSPF |
Link State |
IGP |
110 |
Cost |
Classless | Dikstra (SPF) |
OSPF protocol 89 |
| Integrated IS-IS |
Link State |
IGP |
115 |
Cost |
Classless | Dikstra (SPF) | |
| EIGRP |
Hybrid (Advanced Distance Vector) |
IGP |
90 (internal) 170 (external) |
Composite (BW + DLY) |
Classless | DUAL |
EIGRP Protocol 88 |
| BGP |
Path Vector |
EGP |
20 (external) 200 (internal) |
Path Attributes (Usually AS-Path) |
Classless | TCP/179 |
There is obviously more to it than what you see here but for the CCNA this should be pretty good.
I think the the founder 0f ospf should be “Dijkstra”
regards,
Johnson